Eunomia

Eunomia

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
The Pitfalls of a Trilateral Anti-China Pact

The Pitfalls of a Trilateral Anti-China Pact

The measures that hawks believe will intimidate other states often goad them into taking more aggressive actions.

Daniel Larison's avatar
Daniel Larison
Jul 18, 2023
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
The Pitfalls of a Trilateral Anti-China Pact
2
4
Share

Hal Brands proposes getting U.S. allies to commit to fighting a war they don’t want to fight:

What Washington can do is exploit the blowback Chinese coercion is already causing to secure an explicit agreement that three crucial regional powers — Australia, Japan and the US — will all be in it together if war comes.

It is doubtful that Japan or Australia would want to agree to this. As I just showed in my column this week, the Japanese government is reluctant to make any commitments about what it would do in the event of a war over Taiwan, and one of the big reasons for this is that most people in Japan don’t want their armed forces to be in the fight. Only 11% of respondents say that they think Japan’s Self-Defense Forces should join a fight over Taiwan. That would make any explicit commitment connected to this issue very controversial and politically dangerous for any government that agreed to it.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Daniel Larison
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share