Eunomia

Eunomia

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
The Insanity of Broad Sanctions

The Insanity of Broad Sanctions

The collective punishment that broad sanctions inflict is never unintended.

Daniel Larison's avatar
Daniel Larison
May 25, 2023
∙ Paid
12

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
The Insanity of Broad Sanctions
3
5
Share

Josh Rogin defends our government’s indefensible Syria sanctions:

It’s true that sanctions can have unintended consequences for civilians, which is why the legislation carves out exceptions for genuine humanitarian aid. Critics will also argue that sanctions on Assad haven’t worked so far. But that’s only because the Caesar Act has never been properly used.

The consequences that broad sanctions have for civilians aren’t unintended, and humanitarian carveouts do very little to alleviate the hardship that sanctions create. The carveouts are a band-aid that cannot possibly staunch the bleeding caused by the massive trauma of broad sanctions. Sanctionists hide behind these exemptions so that they can pretend that their preferred policy is much more humane than it is. It isn’t possible for them to justify a policy that starves and impoverishes innocent people, so they distract from the real costs of the policy by boasting that at least some aid is allowed to get through.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Daniel Larison
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share