Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris G's avatar

One thing that our foreign policy has excelled at over the last two decades has been on inflicting untold misery on millions of innocent people. Our sanctions regimes alone, on Afghanistan, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, Iran, Yemen, and probably a dozen other countries has achieved next to nothing in terms of benefit to the US. Yet our policy elite seems addicted to continuing these malicious actions. What makes it even worse, is that many of these sanctions were levied after we had destroyed the physical and social infrastructure of some of these countries. Pure evil.

Expand full comment
Paul Reichardt's avatar

There’s a strange moral reasoning at play. The model of applying a sanctions regime is a kind of virtue signaling that we, the US, is making a statement of disapproval of a certain government, even if—as is usually the case-- those sanctions are not effective in general or effective in advancing US interests in particular or actually have terrible humanitarian consequences as implemented. It's the signal that matters, not the all-too-predictable consequences. The sanctions on Iraq in the 90’s is a classic example.

Similarly, there’s that disdain for diplomacy and “negotiating with terrorists”, in which those approaches are moral abominations because they signal an implied US imprimatur of legitimacy on those governments even if they advance US interests and avoid conflict (or nuclear proliferation).

The reasoning seems to be that all moral culpability for the negative humanitarian impacts of that sanctions rest on the “bad actor” governments, whose actions US policymakers assert precipitated the need for those sanctions. There’s no apparent constraint for proportionality or justifiability in their use in light of the economic hardships they can cause on the usually innocent population or any barrier to prevent them from being used as a naked act of aggression to destabilize governments. We can do all that and still maintain the delusion of believing ourselves to being the “good guys.” It’s a kind of moral narcissism.

Maybe all that would be fine, if idealistic and impractical, but then they’ll go full Henry Kissinger and throw their arms around the governments of illiberal autocratic regimes in Saudi Arabia and Egypt and shower them with subsidies and arms deals, for which of course we bear no moral culpability when those arms and subsidies are used to terrorize innocents and brutalize their own people.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts