Eunomia

Eunomia

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
No, Obama Didn't 'Kill' Nonproliferation

No, Obama Didn't 'Kill' Nonproliferation

Mead’s column exemplifies everything that is wrong with the state of our foreign policy debates today.

Daniel Larison's avatar
Daniel Larison
Apr 11, 2023
∙ Paid
13

Share this post

Eunomia
Eunomia
No, Obama Didn't 'Kill' Nonproliferation
5
15
Share

Walter Russell Mead doesn’t know much about nonproliferation:

History will name Barack Obama as the man on whose watch nonproliferation definitively failed.

Mead’s column exemplifies everything that is wrong with the state of our foreign policy debates today. It is inaccurate about many things, Mead lies more than once, and there is no supporting evidence to back up any of his most important claims. The column got published anyway, complete with a repeat of Mead’s favorite lie about Iran’s nuclear program. All of this is forced into a brain-dead hawkish framing that Mead uses to blame one of the biggest supporters of nonproliferation for the supposed death of nonproliferation. The average reader that doesn’t know much about the subject would come away from it with a worse understanding of the relevant issues than when he started. Mead’s analysis leaves his audience more in the dark than they were before.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Daniel Larison
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share